Manipulative impact of students to the teachers in universities of our country
Abstract
Purpose of the research. Studying of manipulative communication between students and teachers.
Material and methods of research. The research was carried out on the basis of monitoring of the educational process and analysis of the passing exams and ratings in educational institutions.
Results of the research and its discussion. As it has shown in this research, the student-manipulator attaches great importance to the formation of attraction through non-verbal influence on the teacher. Most of, students often mention the ability to portray a sickly, tired look, an intelligent facial expression, an attentive and interested listener, to cry or smile in time. According to students sights, the teacher can be “innocent”, “languid”, “interested”, “understanding”, “begging”. The image created with the help of clothes, jewelry, make-up may vary depending on the situation, the teacher, the manipulative intention.
The teacher’s natural defense against student manipulation is a high degree of his professionalism and communicative competence (3).
Conclusion. The manipulative communication in higher education is counterproductive, and work to prevent it will contribute to the establishment of truly humane relationships between teachers and students, contributing to an increase in the effectiveness of educational work at the university, professional and personal growth of participants in pedagogical interaction.
About the Authors
S. M. KurbonovaTajikistan
Saida M. Kurbanova - acting head department of public health, medical statistics, history of medicine NOU “Medical and Social Institute of Tajikistan”.
734019, st. Clara Setkina-2
Tel: (+992) 918-79-85-16
M. Z. Kurbonova
Tajikistan
M. M. Egamova
Tajikistan
References
1. Birakh, A. Psychology of facial expressions. - M.: Marketing, 2004;
2. Borg, D. The power of persuasion. The art of influencing people. - M., 2013;
3. Laptenok, S.D. Spiritual and moral world of student youth. Minsk, 2001, - p.37;
4. Sheinov, V.P. Psychology of manipulation. Minsk, 2010;
5. Huseynova, Zh.A. Manipulative actions of students// International Journal of Experimental Education. - 2013, - No. 4 - p.99 -101.
6. Gegen, N. Psychology of manipulation and submission. SPb., 2005.
Review
For citations:
Kurbonova S.M., Kurbonova M.Z., Egamova M.M. Manipulative impact of students to the teachers in universities of our country. Herald of the medical and social institute of Tajikistan. 2023;(4):37-41. (In Russ.)




